Evaluating tool usage The tool isn't available right now, and the prompt didn't set up the commands properly. I could use shell commands or network enabled options, but maybe it's not necessary since the user didn't specifically ask for it. They might just want a summary or a reaction. Given their input, which is a headline, I could provide a brief overview about goalkeepers in the UCL since 2011, mentioning top names and relevant stats from Opta.Assessing goalkeeper stats I’ve noticed some stats since the 2011-12 UCL season. For instance, Manuel Neuer has 10 errors leading to goals, while others include Lloris with 8, De Gea with 7, and so on. I recall Onana had notable mistakes during his time with Ajax and Inter, but I need to be careful and not make things up. Should I ask the user if they want the full list or a quick context? I think I’ll offer them options, including breakdowns or video examples!Crafting a response in Chinese I want to create a friendly and concise answer in Chinese. I could include a commentary and offer to pull the complete list with sources if needed. I'll focus on keeping it simple without heavy formatting, maybe even using bullets for clarity. I could start with: Then, I can ask if they want the full ranking and descriptions of specific errors. I’ll also mention that ranking can depend on playtime to provide a bit of nuance.Planning response format I want to create a concise comment and offer to fetch a relevant list if needed. Including a small table could be useful, but I need to avoid heavy formatting according to the guidelines. Using bullet points might work well to keep it simple and clear. I’ll keep it friendly and straightforward, making sure to focus on providing helpful information. I think this approach will make the response easy to read and informative!



这类“失误导致丢球”是按 Opta 的口径统计,自2011-12赛季起的欧冠数据。诺伊尔出场多、参与度高( sweeper-keeper 风格,脚下与出击频繁),样本基数大叠加高风险动作,长期下来登顶并不意外。奥纳纳同样偏主动,近年在高压出球与长传组织里也更容易被记录到此类失误。
要点

需要我把完整榜单(每位门将的次数、赛季分布)和来源链接整理给你吗?也可以按球员或球队维度做对比,或挑某位门将做逐次失误回放/成因分析。